Skip to main content

Writing for Emotional Impact

In addition to a panel on writing horror, macabre, and supernatural tales, for Arisia 2018, I'm also in a panel entitled "Emotional Impact - Making Readers Care!"


End of Day by Morgan Crooks (2017)
Assuming for a moment I've written stories containing characters readers care about, what advice could I give to aspiring writers?
To repeat a bit from last post, my big three pieces of advice are rather simple and self-evident:

  • Read Everything
  • Write as Much as Possible
  • Reflect on Your Art
To paraphrase from the previous writing advice post, read everything simply means an aspiring writer must first be a diligent reader. You must be a fan of those books generating a strong emotional response.

As you begin to figure out what you like and don't like in stories and other types of literature, begin to write. I do not think you need to write every single day to be a writer. I also don't think you somehow stop being a writer if you put down the pen (so to speak) for a day, week, year, or decade. However, like any there craft, practice is important. If you get stuck, find one of your favorite stories and copy it down word for word. Watch how a writer you respect manufactures a certain emotional response and try to do that.

Which gets us to my last more or less universal piece of advice: reflect on your art. Partly this means you should think about what you do. You should be intentional. This also means asking questions. It means you should seek to take apart each thing you read, word-by-word, to see how it ticks.

Now for some best practices that I can't guarantee help in all circumstances but do strike me as useful in creating works with emotional impact

Write from the emotion, not about it. Emotion is not something you describe to a reader it's something you make the reader feel. Don't say what emotion a character is experiencing, describe her actions, mental state, and speech so clearly that there can be no mistake what the character is experiencing.

Become a student of human emotions. Your emotions. The emotions of the people around you. The emotions recorded in art and research. Start a journal where you describe how emotions feel, what people look like when they have emotions, and the turns of phrase in literature summing up each subtle shade of emotional response. Shamelessly raid this journal when you feel tempted to describe a character as 'sad,' or 'happy,' or filled with nostalgia.

Study how other writers make you feel emotions. Obviously you want to learn how to create strong emotions to add weight and drama to your work but you also want to be able to capture nuance. There is as much power in a quiet moment of dread as there is the final shock of discovery.

Aim for conflicting emotions. I find the works that truly grab ahold of me are ones where I'm not sure exactly how I should feel, I just know that I feel something deeply. My go-to example of this is William Faulkner's final scene of his novel "The Bear." I actually wrote a bit about this in a very old post in Ancient Logic, expressing my love for how this scene describes a hunter's rising jealous mania while still preserving the moment in kind of pastoral sheen of beauty. This scenes tugs a person's heart in conflicting directions. Such complicated responses form strong bonds with the reader.

Junot Diaz and Ken Liu are two writers I believe craft and sustain emotional impact routinely in their works. "The Brief, Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao" is one of my all-time favorite novels and contains the full range of human sentiment: anger, love, despair, humor, and peace. A far shorter but no less devastating work is "The Paper Menagerie" by Ken Liu, a spare tale of investing a single crumpled paper tiger with all tragic impact of Greek tragedy.

When you write emotions, you must, on some level feel those emotions. You don't have to have experienced exactly the same thing as a character. How many of us have been trapped inside of a bomb shelter with a murderous blood-thirsty rat, as is the case in Premee Mohamed's macabre flash fiction piece "16 Minutes." This story, despite its few words, expertly establishes the fear and claustrophobia of the narrator before drawing the noose tight around his neck. This effect happens despite Mohamed never once using the words 'afraid,' 'terror,' or 'trapped.' The narrator's increasingly frantic attempts to assuage his guilt and isolation manifest as pleas for more time and the bewildering attacks of the rat.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With the title World War Z

Early on in the mostly disappointing zombie epidemic thriller World War Z, UN Investigator Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) hides out in a Newark apartment, trying to convince a family living there to flee with him from the hordes of sprinting, chomping maniacs infesting the city. The phrase he uses, drawing from years of experience in the world's troubled war-zones is "movement is life." Ultimately he's unsuccessful, the family barricades their door behind him and they join the ever-swelling ranks of the undead. As far as a guiding philosophy goes for a pop-action thriller like World War Z, 'movement is life,' isn't bad. And for the first half of the movie or so, it follows its own advice. Similar to other recent zombie movies (Dawn of the Dead, Shaun of the Dead) the warning signs of what the rest of the movie will bring are subtle and buried until all hell is ready to break through. The television mentions 'martial law,' Philadelphia traffic snarl
I’m going to take a slightly abbreviated approach to this year’s best-of lists and mostly focus on movies. It’s not that I didn’t read or listen to music but for whatever reason I feel uninspired to talk about either topic. C’est la vie! So in no particular order are five movies I greatly enjoyed watching this year. Firstly, Avengers: Endgame. Well, I guess there is some order to this list because literally the first thing I thought of in terms of movies I’ve seen is this movie. It is inevitable! This is the one MCU flick it’s hard for me to remember as simply a super-hero film. Although I found its predecessor a bit more more compulsively watchable, I really enjoyed this film. First of all it’s tone, which veered from despair, heist hijinx, parental reconciliation, to epic mega-brawl was never boring. Even the gorgeous mess which is that final fight has its own interior logic and sports some of the best looking cinematography this side of Black Panther. With Endgame MCU found a

Stephen King's 2017

Despite the release of a single novel and a few short stories, 2017 has to rank up there as one of the more Stephen King ascendant years. No less than four movies based on his works appeared, including one of the most successful horror films of all time, the first part of IT. 'The Mist' (Stephen King) by Dementall.deviantart.com Of course, with King, for every high, there are plenty of lows and 2017 also provided a number of examples of how to do his works wrong. But let's start with the good stuff. The movie adaptation of IT, directed by Andres Muschietti and starring a number of talented young actors (including Finn Wolfhard of "Stranger Things" fame) really captured, for me, a lot of what I liked about the original novel. Being scary certainly helped, but with King, the horror slice is never really the whole cake. What makes King King, at least for me, is the combination of earthy, believable characters with lurid, "Tales from the Crypt&quo